论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较中西医结合治疗与单纯西医治疗手足口病临床疗效的差异。方法:567例手足口病患者随机分成两组,对照组282例,单纯采用西医治疗,治疗组285例,在西医治疗基础上加用中药汤剂联合治疗,观察两组患者退热时间,皮疹消褪时间,食纳改善时间,比较两组间治愈率,有效率差异。结果:治疗组与对照组有效率均为100%;治愈率治疗组88.1%,对照组86.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);重症患者治愈率治疗组为83.3%,对照组为74.1%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);退热时间治疗组为2.65±0.79天,对照组为3.20±0.82天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);食纳改善时间治疗组为2.28±0.85天,对照组为3.35±0.68天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);结论:中西医结合治疗手足口病在重症患者治愈率,退热时间,食纳改善时间上优于单纯西药治疗。
Objective: To compare the clinical curative effect between traditional Chinese and western medicine and western medicine in treating hand-foot-mouth disease. Methods: 567 HFMD patients were randomly divided into two groups. The control group consisted of 282 patients who were treated with Western medicine alone. The treatment group was 285 cases. Based on the western medicine treatment, combined with decoction of traditional Chinese medicine, the antipyretic time, Fade time, take time to improve, compare the cure rate between the two groups, the effective rate difference. Results: The effective rates of the treatment group and the control group were 100%; the cure rate was 88.1% in the treatment group and 86.2% in the control group, with no significant difference (P> 0.05); the cure rate of the severe patients was 83.3% in the treatment group, (P <0.05); The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); The time of treatment group was 2.65 ± 0.79 days and the control group was 3.20 ± 0.82 days, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05) Was 2.28 ± 0.85 days, the control group was 3.35 ± 0.68 days, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); Conclusion: Integrative Chinese medicine treatment of hand-foot-mouth disease in critically ill patients cure rate, antipyretic time, In Western medicine treatment.