论文部分内容阅读
曾被视为“煤矿杀手”和温室效应“罪魁祸首”的煤层气,自20世纪70年代石油危机起,成为一种极具经济价值的气体资源。在我国,从1998年开始,煤层气的勘探、开采与石油、天然气一样实行登记制。通常认为,得到清晰界定的产权有利于资源的有效配置。但由于煤层气是一种与煤炭相伴相生的资源,现实存在的“采煤必然动气”、“采气必然动煤”问题,不可避免地引发煤层气企业和煤矿企业之间的纠纷,从而严重影响两种资源的有效开采和利用。煤层气和煤炭两种矿业权重置被视为产生这种纠纷的最重要原因。很多人认为,“双权合一”是解决纠纷的最佳途径。本文尝试从博弈视角来审视这一纠纷,认为“双权重置”下的利益冲突,可以通过确定最佳侵权赔偿和补贴额的方法加以解决,并避免“双权合一”可能带来的巨大成本和效率损失。
CBM, once considered the “killer of coal mines” and the “culprit” of the greenhouse effect, has become an economically valuable source of gas since the oil crisis of the 1970s. In our country, since 1998, the CBM exploration and exploitation have been implemented in the same way as oil and natural gas. It is generally assumed that a well-defined property right facilitates the efficient allocation of resources. However, since CBM is a kind of resource that accompanies coal, there is a real problem that coal mining must move and coal mining inevitably leads to a problem between CBM enterprises and coal mining enterprises Disputes, thus seriously affecting the effective exploitation and utilization of the two resources. Resetting CBM and coal mining rights is seen as the most important cause of such disputes. Many people think that “unity of duality ” is the best way to resolve disputes. This article attempts to examine this dispute from a game perspective, believing that the conflict of interests under “double right reset ” can be solved by determining the best method of compensation for infringement and the amount of subsidy, and avoiding Possible huge cost and efficiency losses.