论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价无痛人流与药物流产在临床上的应用比较。方法:将符合研究纳入标准的无痛人流患者50例以及同期进行药物流产的患者50例设为参与对象,共100例,均于2015年1月份到2015年12月份在我院进行治疗。评价两组患者的治疗情况。结果:相应的治疗后,无痛人流组的成功流产例数有50例(100%),药物流产组的成功流产例数有45例(90%),数据的比较经χ2检验有统计学意义,P<0.05;手术情况以无痛人流最为理想,相关指标(术中出血量、疼痛持续时间)与药物流产组的比较经t检验有统计学意义,P<0.05。部分患者出现不良反应,以无痛人流组的不良反应最少,数据的比较经χ2检验有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:应用无痛人流,相比药物流产的治疗效果要好,且出血少,镇痛理想,是早期妊娠终止的一种有效措施。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical application of painless abortion and medical abortion. Methods: Fifty patients with painless abortion who met the criteria of the study and 50 patients who underwent medical abortion in the same period were enrolled. A total of 100 patients were treated in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2015. Evaluation of the treatment of two groups of patients. Results: After the corresponding treatment, there were 50 cases (100%) of successful abortion in painless abortion group and 45 cases (90%) of successful abortion abortion in medical abortion group. The data of 2 groups were statistically significant , P <0.05. The operation condition was the most ideal for painless abortion. The relative indexes (intraoperative blood loss, pain duration) compared with medical abortion group were statistically significant by t test (P <0.05). Some patients showed adverse reactions to painless flow group, the least adverse reactions, the data were compared by χ2 test was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: It is an effective measure to terminate the early pregnancy by using painless abortion, which is better than medical abortion and has less bleeding and ideal analgesia.