论文部分内容阅读
不论散文的概念如何界定,不论散文的范围扩展到何种程度或狭窄到何种地步,“闲话”与“诗化”两类散文在散文“王国”中的正宗地位,随着散文盛衰起伏的历史变革日趋明朗,越来越为更多的人们所接受,所确认。尽管“闲话”与“诗化”两类散文还没有在文学类说中注册立名,尽管在辞书中还没有列入闲话散文与诗化散文的词语条目,但是,二者不仅具有往日的辉煌,而且在新时期中蓬勃繁荣,蔚然壮观。散文的三千余年悠久历史和散文体裁定义的模糊不清,散文作品的光华璀灿和散文本体特征的似有若无,显得何等的失调,又是何等的令人怅惘！散文从它的起始点——文体本性上,就陷入了沼泽泥泞之中,虽殚尽其力却难以启动前行。散文理论何以走出困境,何以突破僵局?这里试以“闲话”与“诗化”为题,换一个角度切入散文的文本世界,也许不致重蹈枉然徒劳的复辙。
No matter how the concept of the essay is defined, no matter what extent the essay expands or narrows to what extent, the authentic status of the gossip and the poetic essay in the essay “Kingdom” The historical changes are becoming clearer and more and more and more people are accepted and confirmed. Although two kinds of essays, “gossip” and “poeticization,” have not yet been registered in literary classics, even though they have not yet been included in the dictionary of gossip essays and poetic essays, they both have the brilliant past But also prosperous and magnificent in the new period. The essay has more than three thousand years of vague definition of the long history and the definition of prose genre. The brilliance of the prose works and the ontological features of the essay are similar. From its starting point - stylistic nature, the essay plunges into the muddy swamp. It is hard to start its prosecution despite all its efforts. Why prose theory out of the woods, why break through the impasse? Here to try to “gossip” and “poeticization” as a theme, from another perspective into the text of the prose world, may not be repeated in vain in vain.