论文部分内容阅读
目的比较西医及中西医治疗周围性面瘫效果,探讨中西医治疗优越性.方法选取并回顾性分析自2011-01至2012-01于我院接受周围性面瘫中西医治疗的患者60例为研究组,选取同时期接受西医治疗的患者60例为对照组,比较两组患者治疗效果和疗程.结果研究组总有效率为91.67%,对照组总有效率73.33%,两组存在明显差异(X2=6.98,P<0.05).比较两组总体有效患者疗程,研究组明显少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(p=0.00).结论中西医治疗该病疗效明显优于单用西医治疗,在控制感染的前提下配合局部治疗和中药治疗功能缩短疗程,提高治愈效果.“,”Objective: To compare the clinical effect of treating peripheral facial paralysis with chinese with western medicine therapy and only western medicine therapy to discuss advantage of chinese with western medicine therapy. Methods: Choosed 60 patients of peripheral facial paralysis from Jan. 2011 to Jan. 2012 as study group with chinese with western medicine therapy, and choosed 60 cases treated with western medicine only as controled group. Compared the clinical effect of these two groups. Results: The total effective rate in study group was 91.67%, and 73.33% in controled group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Using Chinese with western medicine therapy to treat peripheral facial paralysis receive better effect than using western medicine only, and could improve to short course and cure effect.