论文部分内容阅读
目的分析氧驱雾化与超声雾化两种吸入疗法的应用,以求最佳护理方法,优选适宜婴幼儿的方式。方法将60例毛细支气管炎患儿随机分为超声雾化组和氧驱雾化组,在相同其他治疗下,分别配合超声与氧驱雾化,观察操作方法、疗效、不良反应,及是否便于临床实际操作。结果两种雾化吸入方式疗效差异无统计学意义,而不良反应差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论婴幼儿应优先选用氧驱雾化,不良反应小,有利于临床实际操作。
Objective To analyze the application of oxygen inhalation and ultrasonic nebulization in two kinds of inhalation therapy in order to find the best nursing method and optimize the way for infants and children. Methods Sixty children with bronchiolitis were randomly divided into ultrasonic atomization group and oxygen-driven atomization group. Under the same treatment, the patients were treated with ultrasonic and oxygen atomization respectively to observe the operation method, curative effect, adverse reaction, Clinical practice. Results There was no significant difference in curative effect between the two inhalation modes, but the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion Infants and young children should be the preferred oxygen atomization spray, adverse reactions, is conducive to clinical practice.