论文部分内容阅读
传统观念认为:癫痫的预后不佳。随着病程的迁延,更多的患者趋于复发,1968年Rodin氏回顾半个多世纪的文献,得出此结论。1984年,Shoron氏指出Rodin氏研究中所出现的失误是:1.回顾性研究的剖面,是基于易变的、不稳定的、有着各种类型的癫痫人群;2.所有复习的文献中,患者都大量的服用了至今仍在广泛应用的抗癫痫药物。经过Shoron氏的评论后,才使人们开始对癫痫预后有了信心。1979年,Amegers氏等分析Mayo临床记录联动系统中记录时,把记录中1935年～1974年之间的475位癫痫患者拿来,进行回顾性研究发现:首次发作以后的20年里,近70%的患者有5年缓解,50%
The traditional view that: poor prognosis of epilepsy. As the disease progresses, more patients tend to relapse, Rodin’s review of more than half a century of literature in 1968, come to this conclusion. In 1984, Shoron pointed out that the errors in the Rodin’s study were: 1. The retrospective study was based on a variable, unstable population with various types of epilepsy; 2. In all reviews, Patients are taking large amounts of antiepileptic drugs that are still widely used. After Shoron’s comments, people began to have confidence in the prognosis of epilepsy. In 1979, when Amegers et al. Analyzed Mayo clinical records linkage system records, 475 epilepsy patients, who were recorded between 1935 and 1974, were retrospectively reviewed and found that nearly 20 years after the first episode % Of patients have 5 years of relief, 50%