论文部分内容阅读
1994年度中国经济史论著,无论数量或质量,大抵不下于往年。发展仍然是不平衡的。从研究领域看,土地制度阶级关系等传统热门课题论著减少,商品经济与农业经济、区域史、民族史与民族交往史等逐渐成为新的热点;从研究时段看,虽然仍以断代史的论著为主,但总论性和跨代研究明显增多。兹把后者简介如下: 社会经济形态 中外比较研究 关于社会经济形态学说,《史学理论研究》第1期发表了三篇文章:田昌五/破除中国历史东方类型说,振兴马克思主义历史学;苏凤捷/马克思的社会经济形态演进学说和魏特夫对
The book on the history of the Chinese economy of 1994, no matter the quantity or the quality, is probably no less than in previous years. The development is still uneven. From the perspective of research, the reduction of the number of traditional hot topics such as class relations in the land system has gradually become a new hot spot in commodity economy, agricultural economy, regional history, national history and ethnic contact history. From the study period, Lord, but general and intergenerational research increased significantly. The latter is briefly described as follows: A Comparative Study of Socio-Economic Patterns at Home and Abroad On the theory of socio-economic formations, the first issue of the “Theory of Historical Studies” has published three articles: Tian Chang-wu / Breaking the Chinese Historical Orientations and Revitalizing Marxist Historiography; Su Feng-kai / Marx’s Socio-economic Evolution Theory and Wittoff’s Comment