论文部分内容阅读
某语文教学期刊前段时间就教案的有用性问题展开了讨论。有用和无用都言之成理,有据可依。据我多年的观察,大部分教师的教案是无用的。主要表现在绝大部分教师的教案是抄袭的,甚至在一些比赛上,雷同的教案、课件比比皆是。另外,有些教师上课根本不用教案,教案只是为了应付检查,教案与实际教学完全脱钩,写一套讲一套。讨论教案有用没用,主要看教师的教学态度和精神面貌。热爱语文教学的老师,再没用的教案也会发现出点价值来的。其实“用”是有主体和客体的。用的主体似乎必然是教师,用的客体就值得研究了。应付检查
Some Chinese teaching periodical had discussed the usefulness of teaching case some time ago. Useful and useless to say reasonable, well documented. According to my years of observation, most teachers’ lesson plans are useless. Mainly manifested in the teaching plan of most teachers is plagiarism, and even in some competitions, the same lesson plans, courseware abound. In addition, some teachers do not have to teach lesson in class at all. The lesson plan is only for coping with the inspection. The lesson plan and the actual teaching are completely decoupled from each other. Discussion lesson plans useful useless, mainly to see the teacher’s teaching attitude and mental outlook. Love the language teaching teachers, no longer use the lesson plans will find a point worth. In fact “use ” is the subject and object. The subject used seems to be the teacher, the object of use deserves to be studied. Deal with the inspection