论文部分内容阅读
《齐物论》的辩说在庄子的思想中是达成以辩止辩、以不齐为齐的有效手段。但庄周并未严格遵守辩说的内在逻辑,且有意忽视了“同”与“不同”在辩论中的对等地位。近代以来的《齐物论》接受史在推进理解深化的同时,以“齐物”论为解读焦点及解读话语上的诗性偏好,也暴露了中国学人轻逻辑推理重个体感悟的思维特点,“接着讲”的学术意识与当下之需尚差有间。
The argument of “homogeneous things” in Zhuangzi’s thought is an effective way to argue with argue and argue with arrogance. However, Zhuang Zhou did not strictly abide by the internal logic of the debate and deliberately ignored the equal position of “same” and “different” in the debate. Since the modern history of the reception of “homogeneous things”, while taking the understanding of “deepening understanding” as the focal point and interpretation of the poetic preferences of discourse as “Qi Zhi”, it also exposes the Chinese scholars’ Thinking characteristics, “Then talk about ” academic awareness and the current needs are still between.