论文部分内容阅读
《内蒙访古》课文前“预习提示”有以下一段话:“预习时要抓住本文夹叙夹议的特点。文中记叙的成份多,议论的成分少……”根据这段话,可以理解编者对本文表达方式的两点基本看法:一是夹叙夹议;二是记叙为主,议论为次。然而,课文后面所编“思考和练习”第三题中又有这么一段话:“全文引用文献资料计十余次。引用的资料虽多但无堆积繁琐之感,反而觉得恰到好处,使作者阐发的感想、看法更有说服力,大大丰富了读者的历史知识。作者这些引用可分两大类:一类是用文献资料来佐证个人见解;一类是用考古资料来实证个人看法。”既然是“引用
The “preliminary reminder” before the “Internal Mongolian Visit to Ancient Times” section has the following paragraph: “Preparation must capture the characteristics of this document. The content of the narrative is much, and the content of the argument is less...” According to this paragraph, the editor can be understood. The two basic views on the expression of this article are as follows: First, the discussion and discussion; second, the narrative and the argument. However, in the third question titled “Thinking and Practice” later in the text, there is another sentence like this: “The full text cited documentary data is counted more than ten times. Although the quoted materials are numerous but not complicated, they feel just right and make the author interpret it. His thoughts and opinions are more persuasive and greatly enrich the reader’s historical knowledge.The authors’ citations can be divided into two categories: one is the use of documentary data to support personal opinions; the other is the use of archeological data to testify personal views.” Is "quote