论文部分内容阅读
随着时代的发展,仲裁凭借其不受地域限制、专业性、保密性、灵活快捷性等优势,在纠纷解决机制中发挥了越来越重要的作用。知识产权纠纷类型中,合同纠纷的可仲裁性毋庸置疑,但侵权纠纷和有效性纠纷是否可以通过仲裁方式解决尚有很大的讨论空间。对于这一问题,本文认为应结合我国实际情况并顺应国际仲裁发展的潮流,区分不同的情况,在时机成熟并适当加以限制的情况下对知识产权侵权纠纷和有效性纠纷的可仲裁性予以认可。最后,文章对国内知识产权仲裁的概况以及广州知识产权仲裁院的现状和发展思路进行了阐述。
With the development of the times, arbitration has played an increasingly important role in the dispute settlement mechanism because of its advantages of geographical limitation, professionalism, confidentiality and flexibility. Among the types of intellectual property disputes, the arbitrability of contract disputes is beyond doubt. However, there is still much room for discussion on whether disputes over infringement and validity can be settled through arbitration. In this regard, this paper argues that we should, in accordance with the actual situation in our country and in accordance with the trend of the development of international arbitration, distinguish between different situations and approve the arbitrability of disputes over intellectual property infringement and validity disputes when the time is right and subject to appropriate restrictions . Finally, the article describes the general situation of domestic intellectual property arbitration and the current situation and development of Guangzhou Intellectual Property Arbitration Court.