“送货上门”引发的官司

• 作 者: 郭小生
• 出 处: 法庭内外
• 发表日期: 2014年07期
• 关键词: 家电商场 河南省南阳市 商业手段 张一 买卖合同 终审判决 一审法院 诚实信用原则 现实生活 令人

在现实生活中,“送货上门”是商品交易市场在长期、反复实践的基础上逐步形成的、被广大客户普遍接受的一种不成文的商业行为,也是商家为了促销而普遍采用的一种商业手段,深受消费者喜欢。但如果商家付费指派无营运资质之人去送货而发生意外,导致第三人受到伤害,责任该由谁承担?2014年2月,河南省南阳市中级法院对外公布了这起令人深思的健康权纠纷案,从中给出了清晰的答案。

In real life, “home delivery ” is a commodity trading market in the long-term, based on repeated practice gradually formed, is generally accepted by our customers an unwritten business practices, but also the merchants in order to promote the widespread adoption A commercial means, by consumers like it. However, if the business paid to assign non-working people to deliver goods unexpectedly, resulting in the third person hurt, who should bear the responsibility? In February 2014, Henan Nanyang Intermediate People’s Court announced this thought-provoking Right to health disputes, which gives a clear answer.