论文部分内容阅读
必须兴无灭资,才能彻底贯彻教育方针通过教育方针的学习,我们都肯定数学教学必须与生产劳动相结合。可是,在实际投入教学改革工作——编写教材的时候,却又产生了许多不同的思想情况:有些同志以为数学是一门抽象的科学,有其本身发展的规律很难和实际联系;有些同志以为自己缺乏生产知识,无法联系生产实际;也有些同志希望专家们早些编出一套联系生产的教材,便可解决问题了。数学究竟是不是一门抽象的科学?恩格斯在反杜林论中曾对数学给出了精湛的定义,他说“数学的对象是现实世界的空间形式和数量关系,所以是非常现实的资料”。他还说“数的概念和形的概念,同是得自外面世界的,而不是头脑中,从纯粹的思维产生的。”人民日报在一篇评论(1958年8月20日)中也曾提到“数学向来被人们认为是
There must be no extinguishment of capital, only in full implementation of the education policy. Through the education policy, we all affirm that mathematics teaching must be combined with production labor. However, in the actual implementation of teaching reform work, the preparation of teaching materials has produced many different ideological situations: Some comrades think that mathematics is an abstract science, and it is difficult to communicate with the actual laws of its own development; some comrades They believe that their lack of production knowledge can not be linked to the actual production; some comrades hope that the experts will compile a set of textbooks linking production earlier and solve the problem. Is mathematics an abstract science? Engels gave a superb definition of mathematics in anti-Duhring theory. He said that “the object of mathematics is the spatial form and quantity relationship of the real world, so it is a very realistic data.” . He also said that “the concept of numbers and the concept of figures are derived from the outside world, not from the mind, from pure thought.” The People’s Daily also wrote in a commentary (August 20, 1958). Mentioned that "mathematics has always been considered