论文部分内容阅读
刑事诉讼证明标准问题作为证据法学的一个基本问题 ,既是法学界高度关注的热点问题 ,又是实务中亟需解决的焦点问题。目前 ,学者、同仁提出的诸种刑事诉讼证明标准 ,均存在难以实际把握的缺陷。根据辩证唯物主义原理和我国刑事诉讼证明实际 ,我国刑事审判中判定被告人有罪的证明标准 ,可以设定为三种 :一般标准 :高度盖然性与排除合理怀疑的有机结合 ;特殊标准 :证据确实、充分 ;简易标准 :证据优势
As a basic problem in evidence jurisprudence, the standard of proof of criminal procedure is not only a hot issue that is highly concerned by the jurisprudence field, but also a focus issue urgently needed to be solved in practice. At present, scholars and colleagues put forward various kinds of criminal procedural standards of proof, which are hard to grasp. According to the principle of dialectical materialism and the actual proof of criminal procedure in our country, there are three kinds of proving standards for judging the guilt of defendants in criminal trial: general standard: Adequate; simple standard: Evidence advantage