论文部分内容阅读
全文分三部分:第一部分讨论比较方法中的一些问题,并通过比较揭示中国和西方/德国的史学研究中的不平等关系及其后果。第二部分,作者把1980年代以来中国史学研究中出现的社会史研究潮流称为“社会史转向”(Soc ialH istory Turn),分析其特征并以其为例呈现中国史学研究在全球学术结构中的自我定位。第三部分,通过比较德国与中国社会史兴起过程中的异同来“构建他者”(to Construct the O ther)和“衡量差异”(toM easure the D ifference),从而指出占统治地位的线性发展和现代化模型是以统一的全球意识形态体系为基础的,并强调对其重新思考的必要性。
The full text is divided into three parts: The first part discusses some problems in the comparative method, and reveals the inequality and its consequences in historical studies of China, the West and Germany by comparison. In the second part, the author refers to the trend of social history research in Chinese historiography since the 1980s as Sociological Histories Turn, analyzes its characteristics and uses it as an example to show that Chinese historiography is in the global academic structure Self-positioning. The third part, “Construct the Ort” and “ToM easure the Difference”, by comparing the similarities and differences between the social history of Germany and China, points out the dominance of the linear development And modern models are based on a unified global ideology and emphasize the need to rethink them.