论文部分内容阅读
随着我国各项事业的不断向前发展,尤其是在社会主义和谐社会和社会主义法治理念的指引下,众多学者和司法实务人员开始对“两少一宽”提出了诟病,并形成了两种针锋相对的观点。一种观点认为,“两少一宽”的民族刑事政策是赋予给少数民族犯罪分子的一种特权,它是同我国宪法所规定的“法律面前人人平等”原则相违背的,这样的刑事政策并不能在社会的稳定发展、人权的保障、公正的实现等方面发挥积极功效,据此主张废除“两少一宽”民族刑事政策;另一种观点则认为,“两少一宽”的民族刑事政策在当下的确存在着这样或那样的问题,但是,从其产生和发展的过程来看,“两少一宽”的民族刑事政策在当下依旧有其存在的必要性和合理性,并不能因为客观的实际环境的发生了变化,就全面地否定它的存在和功效,我们应该在新的形势下对“两少一宽”民族刑事政策进行新的解读和改良。
With the continuous development of various undertakings in our country, especially under the guidance of the socialist harmonious society and the socialist concept of the rule of law, many scholars and judicial practitioners have begun to criticize and form two smaller ones and one broader ones Two diametrically opposed views. One view is that the national criminal policy of “two minorities and one leniency” is a privilege given to ethnic criminals and is contrary to the principle of “equality before the law” as stipulated in our constitution This kind of criminal policy can not play an active role in the steady development of society, the guarantee of human rights and the just realization of the realization of the criminal policy. Therefore, it advocates the abolition of the national criminal policy of “two minorities and one leniency”; in another view, The national criminal policy of “two minorities and one leniency” does exist one or more problems nowadays. However, judging from the process of its emergence and development, the “two minorities and one width” national criminal policy still has The necessity and rationality of its existence can not be totally negated because of the changes in its objective real environment. We should, under the new situation, make revisions to the “two less flaws” national criminal policies New interpretation and improvement.