论文部分内容阅读
引言国际刑事法院《罗马规约》(以下简称《规约》)第30条在国际刑法的发展史上首次对国际刑事法院管辖的国际犯罪的心理要件作了一般性的规定,然而这一规定自诞生之日起就成为学者批评和争议的中心。~([1])对于《罗马规约》第30条关于心理要件的一般规定的理解,特别是对“故意和明知”的措辞的解释,两大法系学者的研究显示了严重的国别倾向,大陆法系背景的学者和英美法系背景的学者存在全然不同的解读。《罗马规约》的起草历史已经表明,其是在两大法系间的争议与妥协中诞生的,这一点
INTRODUCTION Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (hereinafter “the Statute”) provides, for the first time, general provisions on the psychological elements of international crimes governed by the International Criminal Court in the history of the development of international criminal law. However, Since then, scholars have become the center of criticism and controversy. ~ ([1]) The understanding of the general provisions of the Rome Statute on psychoanalytic conditions, especially the interpretation of the wording “intentionally and knowingly,” that the studies of the two legal systems scholars showed a serious state Tendencies, the backgrounds of the civil law system of scholars and Anglo-American legal system background there is a completely different interpretation. The drafting history of the Rome Statute has shown that it was born out of controversy and compromise between the two legal systems