论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)联合干扰素栓治疗宫颈柱状上皮异位的临床效果。方法选取2013年1月-2014年12月该院收治的64例宫颈柱状上皮异位患者为对照组,予以常规LEEP进行治疗;另选取同期该院收治的56例宫颈柱状上皮异位患者为研究组,予以LEEP联合干扰素栓进行治疗。对两组患者进行为期12周的追踪随访,并组织患者定期来院复查,根据其临床症状及改善程度判定疗效并进行对照比较。结果研究组治愈36例,显效12例,有效6例,无效2例;对照组治愈20例,显效10例,有效24例,无效10例。研究组患者的治愈率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=18.582,P<0.05);两组有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.561,P>0.05)。结论 LEEP联合干扰素栓治疗宫颈柱状上皮异位疗效确切,可操作性强,值得在临床上大力推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of cervical ring electrosurgical (LEEP) combined with interferon suppository in the treatment of cervical columnar epithelial ectopic. Methods Sixty-six patients with cervical columnar epithelial ectopic patients admitted from January 2013 to December 2014 in our hospital were selected as the control group and treated with conventional LEEP. In the same period, 56 patients with cervical columnar epithelial ectopic patients Group, to LEEP combined interferon suppository treatment. The two groups of patients were followed up for 12 weeks, and the patients were regularly reviewed in the hospital, and the curative effect was determined and compared according to the clinical symptoms and degree of improvement. Results In the study group, 36 cases were cured, 12 cases were markedly effective, 6 cases were effective and 2 cases were ineffective. In the control group, 20 cases were cured, 10 cases were markedly effective, 24 cases were effective and 10 cases were ineffective. The cure rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 18.582, P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the two groups (χ2 = 0.561, P> 0.05). Conclusion LEEP combined with interferon suppository treatment of cervical columnar epithelial ectopic exact effect, maneuverability, it is worth in the clinical promotion.