论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》的第73条规定打破了过去的刑、民事诉讼一元制的证明标准,较以往立法更为灵活。从原则性与灵活性相结合的角度考虑,我国民事诉讼法应区分不同类型的民事争议,构建一个涵盖“证据确实、充分”、“高度盖然性”、“盖然性占优势”等多个层次的民事诉讼证明标准体系,以适应审判实践中解决不同类型的民事争议的需要。
Article 73 of the Supreme People’s Court’s “Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings” breaks the past standard of proof of the criminal and civil lawsuits and is more flexible than the previous legislation. Considering the combination of principle and flexibility, the civil procedural law in our country should distinguish between different types of civil disputes and construct a system that covers “evidence is true and sufficient”, “highly probabilistic”, “probabilistic” And other levels of civil litigation certification standard system to meet the trial practice to solve the needs of different types of civil disputes.