论文部分内容阅读
目的分析国内危险行为领域的研究现状,为进一步开展相关研究提供参考依据。方法运用文献计量学方法,借助信息可视化软件CiteSpaceⅢ,绘制危险行为领域研究中作者、关键词与科研机构的科学知识图谱,并对相关内容进行数据挖掘与分析。结果国内有关危险行为研究的相关文献发文量呈逐年增长趋势,自2005年突破百篇后,增速明显;2008年后趋于稳步增长。在高发文量作者中,季成叶、刘伟、吴尊友居于前列,发文量均超过20篇。出现频次≥25的关键词共有42个,“艾滋病”、“学生”、“青少年”及“健康教育”等为危险行为领域的研究热点。高发文量机构多为高等院校和各地疾病预防控制中心,且大多分布在我国东部地区,地域差异明显。在干预方案中,以“健康教育”为代表的传统干预方式出现频次最高,有关危险行为新理论与方法的研究较为有限。就科研合作而言,危险行为领域中机构间的合作较作者间的合作明显松散,均缺乏跨领域、跨地区、跨机构间的合作关系。结论各方学者、机构应加强领域内的交流合作,做到优势互补,缩小地区差距,从而推动中国危险行为领域研究的全面深入开展。
Objective To analyze the status quo of research in the field of dangerous behavior in our country and provide references for further research. Methods Using bibliometric method and CiteSpace Ⅲ, a software for information visualization, the scientific knowledge maps of authors, key words and scientific research institutes in the field of risk behavior were drawn and the relevant contents were analyzed. Results The number of published papers on risk behavior research in China increased year by year. Since 2005, the number of articles published has surpassed one hundred, and the growth rate has obviously increased. After 2008, the number of articles published tends to increase steadily. Among the authors with high volume of literature, Ji Chengye, Liu Wei and Wu Zunyou are among the foremost with over 20 papers. A total of 42 key words appear in frequency ≥25, such as “AIDS”, “student”, “youth” and “health education” are the hot topics in the field of dangerous behavior. High volume organizations are mostly institutions of higher learning and around the CDC, and are mostly located in eastern China, regional differences significantly. In intervention programs, the traditional frequency of intervention represented by “health education” is the highest frequency and the research on new theories and methods of dangerous behaviors is relatively limited. As far as scientific research cooperation is concerned, the cooperation between institutions in the field of dangerous behavior is obviously more loosely than the cooperation among the authors, and there is a lack of cross-area, trans-regional and inter-institutional cooperation. Conclusions All scholars and institutions should step up exchanges and cooperation in the field so as to complement each other’s strengths and narrow regional disparities so as to promote a comprehensive and in-depth study of China’s dangerous behaviors.