论文部分内容阅读
建国初期的体育专业研究生教育为我国体育教育事业的发展奠定了良好的基础,但这段历史几乎被人们遗忘。为了给学校体育发展史的研究补充重要史料并提供理论参考,以采访当事人的口述史为基础,结合运用文献资料法和专家访谈法,从历史背景、管理机构、师资队伍、学员构成以及教学、科研、培训等工作的开展、毕业生去向等方面,对我国20世纪50年代由苏联专家指导的北京体育学院和上海体育学院研究生班的情况进行了全面回顾和客观评述。认为苏联专家指导的研究生班,教学管理有序,师资队伍的专业水平较高,实践内容丰富,毕业生的社会影响力较大,办学成效显著。对提高我国的体育师资水平、培养体育科研人才、推动我国学校体育全面发展、促进我国体育科学研究发展和体育理论体系建构、确立我国自己的体育专业研究生教育培养模式等起了积极的作用。但也存在着盲目照搬苏联模式、政治色彩浓重、人才培养目标单一、课程设置不足、重实践轻理论等问题。
The education of postgraduates majoring in physical education in the early days of the founding of our country laid a good foundation for the development of the cause of physical education in our country. However, this history was almost forgotten by people. In order to supplement the important historical materials and provide theoretical reference for the study of the history of school physical education and based on the oral histories of the interviewees, combining the methods of literature review and expert interview, from the historical background, management organization, faculty, trainees and teaching, Scientific research and training, and whereabouts of graduates. We conducted a comprehensive review and an objective review of the graduate classes of Beijing Institute of Physical Education and Shanghai Institute of Physical Education under the guidance of Soviet experts in the 1950s. The postgraduate classes under the guidance of the experts of the Soviet Union are believed to have an orderly teaching management, a high professional level of teaching staff and a rich practical content. Graduates have a great social influence and achieved remarkable results in running schools. It plays an active role in raising the level of physical education teachers in our country, training sports scientific research personnel, promoting the all-round development of school physical education in our country, promoting the development of physical science research in our country, constructing the theoretical system of physical education and establishing our own education mode of physical education major. However, there are also some problems such as the blind copying of the Soviet model, the heavy political overtones, the single objective of personnel training, the inadequate curriculum, and the emphasis on practical light theory.