论文部分内容阅读
刑事诉讼司法实践中,简易程序、认罪答辩程序和普通程序基本对应了由轻到重的案件,而且各种程序都有其在解决刑事纠纷方面的重大价值和意义。然而各刑事程序的转换是单向的、有限的,这既不能体现司法实际的需要,也没有体现公正和效率。以刑事诉权理论为基石,立足于刑事程序的多样性,要求在不同的程序之间进行适当的转换,对于连接三种程序,保证三者的正常运行和发挥作用具有重要意义。同时,为确保公正与效率,亦需在转换后的审理方式、审判组织、审限等方面进行明确。
In the judicial practice of criminal procedure, summary procedure, plea-making procedure and ordinary procedure basically correspond to the light-weight cases, and all kinds of procedures have their great value and significance in resolving criminal disputes. However, the conversion of criminal procedures is unilateral and limited, which can neither reflect the actual needs of the judiciary nor reflect the fairness and efficiency. Based on the criminal prosecution theory, based on the diversity of criminal procedures, it is necessary to make the appropriate conversion among different procedures, which is of great significance for connecting the three kinds of procedures and ensuring the normal operation and function of the three. In the meantime, in order to ensure fairness and efficiency, it is also necessary to make clear the methods of trial after trial, trial organization and judicial review.