论文部分内容阅读
自20世纪90年代起有关儒教式“实学”的研究就已经受到了东亚三国学者们的共同关注。韩国、中国、日本三国两年一届轮流坐庄举行有关“实学”主题的国际研讨会。然而,有关朱子学是否是“实学”这一问题,东亚三国间尚未达成定论。韩国学者认为“实学”是朝鲜后期英祖、正祖时所出现的一种反朱子学的社会思潮。然而将实学家朴趾源的思维模式和朱熹比较之后,我们可以发现,朝鲜“实学”与朱子学之间有着密切渊源。
Since the 1990s, the research on Confucianism and “real learning” has received the common attention of scholars from three East Asian countries. The two countries, South Korea, China and Japan take turns taking turns to hold an international symposium on the subject of “real learning”. However, as to whether Zhu Xi is a “real learning” issue, no conclusion has been reached between the three East Asian countries. Korean scholars believe that “real learning ” is an anti-Zhuzi social trend emerged in the late Joseon ancestor, Zheng Zu. However, comparing the mode of thinking of realist Pu Zhiyuan with that of Zhu Xi, we can find that there is a close relationship between North Korea “Real Learning ” and Zhu Xi.