论文部分内容阅读
修订后的刑诉法第151条第4项规定了证人出庭作证由法院负责通知,但对法庭如何安排证人出庭,出庭证人能否旁听法庭审理等细节问题未作规定。在司法实践中各地做法不一,有的法院在开庭审理一些刑事案件时,出庭作证的证人自始至终在法庭旁听审理,只在需要作证时,证人才从旁听席到证人席上作证。笔者认为,这种做法对证人当庭证言的客观性、公正性易产生负面影响,
Paragraph 4 of Article 151 of the amended Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that the witness shall be responsible for notifying the court in court, but there is no stipulation on how the court should arrange for the witness to appear in court and whether the court witness can attend to the court hearing and other details. In judicial practice, there are different approaches in different places. When some courts hear some criminal cases in court, witnesses who testify before the court attend the court hearing from beginning to end. Only when testimony is needed, witnesses attend testimony from the public gallery to the witness stand. In my opinion, this practice has a negative impact on the objectivity and impartiality of witness testimony in court.