论文部分内容阅读
本文是我们三人对书评学研究所作的初步探讨,意在给比较寂寞的书评理论界增加一点音响。一、书评有学乎彭建炎(以下简称“彭”):在学科林立的当今世界,书评学能否跻身科学的殿堂,恐怕还成问题。也许口头上否认书评学的人并不多,但人们在思想上并不是都承认书评有学的。严一桥(以下简称“严”):这从人们对书评的态度上看得出来。书评文章在我国学人的眼里大多被视为非学术论文,且不说因此造成了我国书评文章的贫乏和书评质量的不高,更为遗撼的是,我国还因此一直没有专业的书评队伍。彭:我不知道萧乾先生是否承认“书评学”,不过就我所知,最早系统研究书评的著作——《书评研究》却出自这位老作家之
This article is a preliminary study on the book review by three of us, which aims to add a little sound to the more lonely book commentators. First, the book reviews have learned PENG Jian-Yan (hereinafter referred to as “Peng”): In the current multi-disciplinary world, book reviews can rank among the hall of science, I am afraid it is also a problem. There are not many people who may verbally deny book reviews but people do not all recognize book reviews in their minds. Yan Yiqiao (hereinafter referred to as “Yan”): This is evident from the attitude of people on the book review. Most of the scholarly commentary in the eyes of Chinese scholars are regarded as non-scholarly papers, not to mention the poor quality of the book review articles in our country and the low quality of the book reviews. Therefore, our country still has no professional book review Team. Peng: I do not know whether Mr. Xiao Qian acknowledged “Book Review,” but as far as I know, the earliest systematic study of book reviews - Book Review Studies came from the old writer