论文部分内容阅读
近年来,曾有多篇拙作引起商榷,我认为这是一件好事。商榷,说明大家对我的文章很关注,否则,谁愿费时费力同你唠叨呢?虑及这些商榷都因立足点不同而起,所以,皆未作回应。我想,其中的是是非非,如有兴趣者,只需比照阅读一下拙作与商榷之文便可判定。但读罢《书法》今年第六期所刊王学彪先生对拙作《现当代书家研究“讳短”现象之忧思》
In recent years, there have been many myths that are open to question. I think this is a good thing. Discuss, that everyone is very concerned about my article, otherwise, who is willing to spend time and laborious with you nagging? Considering these issues are starting from different footholds, so, did not respond. I think one of them is right and wrong. If you are interested, you can only judge by reading the clumsy and deliberative texts. However, reading the “calligraphy” published in the sixth issue of this year, Mr. Wang Xuebiao my clumsy book “Contemporary Book Research ” short taboo “phenomenon of worry”