论文部分内容阅读
《书法》杂志最近刊登了几篇关涉“书法家”身份的文章:《谁给书法家验明正身?》、《无老时代》、《书协与书法家》、《书法阵营论》等。对于文章中的观点,如果仅仅从书法人才培养和书法现象批评的角度看,我非常赞成。但文章也折射出了些许对书法家“身份”的焦虑:忧心书法大师的缺失和有人盗用了“书法家”的名义。我认为大可不必如此多虑。
Calligraphy magazine recently published several articles on the status of “calligrapher”: “Who does it to the calligrapher?”, “No old age”, “Book club and calligrapher”, “Calligraphy camp theory” Wait. For the point of view in the article, I strongly agree with mere criticism of calligraphy talents and calligraphy. But the article also reflects a little anxiety about the calligrapher “identity ”: worrying about the absence of the calligraphist and the misappropriation of the name “calligrapher”. I think we need not worry so much.