论文部分内容阅读
近年来,由于伤寒临床表现的变异及肥达氏反应特异性、敏感性方面的局限性,目前对肥达氏反应的价值评价不一.我们对1983年1月至1987年3月临床诊断为伤寒的289例患者中血培养结果阳性的58例肥达氏反应进行分析,并观察102例肝炎病人的肥达氏反应.以考核其实用价值.一、一般资料 伤寒组58例,男性40例,女性18例,年龄13～58岁,平均24.5±6.3岁.肝病组102例,16～60岁,平均年龄36.8±5.6岁.肥达氏反应的检测方法与判断标准按《微生物学及检验技术》(第1版,人民卫生出版社,1979年7月)的标准.伤寒组测定二次,第1次在发病1周末,第2次间隔1～2周后.肝病组测定1次.
In recent years, due to the clinical manifestations of the typhoid fever and Widal reaction specificity, sensitivity limitations, the current evaluation of the value of the Wadal response to different from our January 1983 to March 1987 clinical diagnosis of 58 cases of typhoid fever in blood culture results of 58 cases of Widal’s reaction analysis and observation of 102 cases of hepatitis patients Widal response to assess its practical value.One general information 58 cases of typhoid fever, 40 cases of male , 18 females, aged 13 to 58 years, mean 24.5 ± 6.3 years old.The liver disease group 102 cases, 16 to 60 years old, with an average age of 36.8 ± 5.6 years.Determination of Widal’s reaction and determine the standard According to the “microbiology and testing Technical ”(1st edition, People’s Health Publishing House, July 1979) .In the typhoid fever group, the first one was at the end of the first week of disease and the second one to two weeks later.