论文部分内容阅读
今年7月号的《文物天地》、《收藏界》发表了拙稿《是醉后名作?还是死后赝品?——傅抱石<龙蟠虎踞图>质疑》一文,从后来的反响来看,拙稿给人们带来的思考还是有的。7月9日《北京娱乐信报》发表了该报记者王健撰写的《参展傅抱石“山水”被指造假主办方称鉴定不同正常》,紧接着《人民日报·市场报》(7月12日)又发表了该报记者王旭辉的《书画鉴定领域有一种怪现象,专家
In July this year, “Heritage World”, “Collection” published a clumsy draft is “drunk masterpieces? Or after the death of fake?” - Fu Baoshi “Longpan Huju chart> questioned” one article, from the later response, I think some people think there is still some people. On July 9, “Beijing Entertainment Letter” published an article entitled “Participation in Fu Baoshi” and “Landscape” in the Exhibition by Wang Jian, a reporter of the newspaper, which claimed that the accreditation organizers said the accreditation was different from normal. “Then,” People’s Daily and Market News “(7 On the 12th) and published the newspaper reporter Wang Xuhui’s ”there is a strange phenomenon in the field of calligraphy and painting identification, experts