论文部分内容阅读
《中华人名共和国反垄断法》(以下简称《反垄断法》)自2008年8月1日施行以来,有关反垄断的民事诉讼自已增多,大量涌现,包括前段时间引起广泛关注的360与腾讯之间的诉讼,以及之前的唐山人人诉百度竞价排名的案件等等。日益增多的反垄断民事诉讼有利于推动反垄断法的实施,其与反垄断执法机构的执法工作共同致力于维护市场秩序,保护竞争自由,符合反垄断法的宗旨。但由于反垄断法案件专业性较强,相关问题也随之出现,其中原告资格的确定就是比较突出的问题之一。原告是启动民事诉讼的钥匙,是解决相关反垄断民事纠纷的起点,因此本文试对反垄断民事诉讼原告资格的确定进行初步论述。
Since the Anti-monopoly Law of the Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Anti-monopoly Law”) came into force on August 1, 2008, civil litigation on antitrust has increased and emerged in large numbers, including 360 and Tencent Between the lawsuit, as well as before the Tangshan Baidu bid for all the cases and so on. The increasing number of antitrust civil litigation is conducive to the promotion of the implementation of the antitrust law. Together with the enforcement of antitrust law enforcement agencies, it is committed to safeguarding market order and protecting competition freedom, in line with the purpose of antitrust law. However, as antitrust law cases are more specialized, related issues also emerge. Among them, the qualification of plaintiffs is one of the more prominent issues. The plaintiff is the key to start civil litigation and the starting point for solving the civil dispute related to antitrust. Therefore, this paper attempts to make a tentative discussion on the determination of the qualification of plaintiff in antitrust civil litigation.