论文部分内容阅读
本研究基于自建语料库,对比分析了中外作者在哲学类学术论文中声音构建策略的异同,研究方法主要是根据声音系统,利用UAM Corpus Tool标注并统计声音类型和声音控制手段。通过比较两者在中外哲学学术话语中分布的不同,可以得出以下结论:哲学学术话语的声音构建策略离不开哲学学科语言的特殊性,而中外作者学术声音建构的差异则源自其东西方文化背景的差异。通过研究这些差异,希望对中国大陆哲学学者撰写国际高水平SSCI英语学术论文提供借鉴。
Based on the self-built corpus, this study compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between Chinese and foreign authors in phonetic dissertations. The research method is mainly based on the sound system, using UAM Corpus Tool to mark and measure the sound types and sound controls. By comparing the different distribution of the two in the academic discourse between China and other countries, we can draw the following conclusions: The phonetic construction strategy of philosophical academic discourse can not be separated from the particularity of the philosophical subject language, but the differences between Chinese and foreign authors’ Different cultural backgrounds. Through studying these differences, I hope to provide reference for Chinese philosophers to write high-level SSCI English academic papers.