论文部分内容阅读
在一些政治经济学的读物中,存在着这样一个似乎是无可置疑的论点,即抽象劳动是只存在于商品经济中的历史范畴。可是,对于这一论点,我觉得还有进一步商榷的必要。我的意见还不成熟,谨将这一论点中自己认为所存在的一些问题,提出来供大家考虑。在以私有制为基础的商品经济中,劳动二重性的存在是与私人劳动和社会劳动的矛盾的存在相联系的。在私有制的经济中,人们的劳动直接地是私人劳动,只有通过交换,借助于抽象劳动的比较,才表现为社会劳动。这里,将具体劳动还原为抽象劳动,才能表现出私人劳动的社会性质。这些道理都是正确的。可是,如果要从这些道
There seems to be no doubt in some readings of political economy that abstract labor is a historical category that exists only in the commodity economy. However, for this argument, I think there is a need for further discussion. My opinion is not yet ripe. I would like to put forward some of the issues that I think exist in this argument for your consideration. In a commodity-based economy based on private ownership, the existence of the duality of labor is linked to the existence of contradictions between private and social labor. In a private-owned economy, people's labor is directly private work. Only through exchange, with the aid of abstract labor, does it appear as social labor. Here, reducing concrete labor to abstract labor can show the social nature of private labor. These truths are correct. However, if you want from these Road