论文部分内容阅读
《注册会计师通讯》1999年第1期刊登了《这场官司为什么先输后赢?》一文,介绍了北京中实会计师事务所二审胜诉的情况,一方面说明会计师事务所应当以客观证据积极应诉,努力走出验资怪圈,另一方面也说明法律界已开始正视验资客观事实,正确面对验资历史遗留问题。
The first issue of the “CPA Newsletter” published in 1999, “Why did this lawsuit lose first and then win?” Introduced the case of Beijing Zhongshi Certified Public Accountants Co., Ltd. which won the second trial. On the one hand, it proves that the accounting firm should actively respond with objective evidence V. Trying hard to get out of the cycle of capital verification. On the other hand, it shows that the legal community has begun to face the objective reality of capital verification and properly confronted the problems left over by history of capital verification.