论文部分内容阅读
关于辽代辽东铁州的地址问题,由于“辽史”记载不明确,引起人们不同的理解.辽金以后,很多史地书、地方志,都认定辽代铁州置于今盖平汤池.1953年左右,北京图书馆、东北人民大学历史系及东北行政委员会文化局等单位,在答复有关方面的询问时,也都断定辽代铁州即今盖平汤池;其中北京大学中国史教研室认为辽之铁州即今之鞍山,但并未提出论据.故问题未获解决.基于以下几点认识,我认为辽代铁州并非置于今之盖平而是置于鞍山.
Liaotung Liaodong Tieshou address problems, as “Liao history ” record is not clear, causing people to different understandings .Liaojin later, a lot of history books, local history, Around 1953, Beijing Library, Department of History of Northeastern People’s University and Northeast Bureau of Culture Bureau and other units, in response to relevant inquiries, but also concluded that the Liaodong Tiezhou is now Geiping Tangchi; which Peking University Chinese History Department that Liao Tiezhou is now Anshan, but did not put forward an argument, so the problem has not been solved.Based on the following understanding, I think Liao Dynasty Tiezhou is not placed in the current cover but placed in Anshan.