论文部分内容阅读
抽象行政行为侵权现象近年日渐突现出来,理论界纷纷呼吁取消对抽象行政行为的司法豁免,但目前我国的立法还是禁止将抽象行政行为提起诉讼。本文主要分析了现行的抽象行政行为监督机制,指出其存在的弊端,并援引其他国家的立法实践,结合我国的现行宪政制度指出在我国实行司法审查是必然的选择,并可以通过立法的技术手段解决其存在的问题。最后文章论述了抽象行政侵权行为的构成要件,包括有:有效并被确认违法、损害事实、因果关系三个部分。
In recent years, the phenomena of abusive abstraction of administrative acts gradually emerge, and theorists have called for the abolition of judicial exemptions for abstract administrative acts. However, at present, our country’s legislation prohibits the prosecution of abstract administrative acts. This paper analyzes the current supervision mechanism of abstract administrative acts, pointing out the shortcomings of its existence, and cites the legislative practice of other countries, combined with the current constitutional system in our country indicates that the implementation of judicial review in our country is an inevitable choice, and through legislative technical means Solve its existing problems. Finally, the article discusses the constitutional elements of abstract administrative tort, including: valid and confirmed illegal, damage facts, causal relationship of three parts.