论文部分内容阅读
社会主义和民主之间的关系一直是引起人们广泛争论的一个问题。索尔仁尼琴曾断言,社会主义民主的观念就像煮冰块一样是意味深长的。M.弗里德曼认为,资本主义是民主的一个必要条件,而在I.克里斯托尔和D.贝尔看来,社会主义对民主的遗弃则导致了社会主义的死亡。他们在这里不仅是说社会主义社会没有能够提供民主和繁荣,而且还意指人们关于社会主义的,可能性甚至理想性信念的崩溃。 但是,社会主义者仍然执着地坚持认为,社会主义和民主之间有着非常牢固的密切联系。N.普兰查斯在他最后一部著作的末尾写道:“有一点是不容怀疑的:社会主义或者是民主的,或者它根本就不会是
The relationship between socialism and democracy has always been a matter of widespread controversy. Solzhenitsyn has asserted that the notion of socialist democracy is as significant as boiling ice. According to M. Friedman, capitalism is a necessary condition for democracy, whereas in the view of I. Cristol and D. Bell, the abandonment of democracy by socialism led to the death of socialism. They are here not only to say that socialist society fails to provide democracy and prosperity, but also means people’s collapse of the socialist possibility and even ideal belief. However, the socialists are still persistently insisting that there is a very strong and close relationship between socialism and democracy. N. Puranchaus wrote at the end of his last book: "It is beyond doubt that socialism is either democratically or that it is not at all