论文部分内容阅读
由于日本消防法中固体氧化物的燃烧试验方法 ,与联合国黄皮书中所建议的试验方法有所不同 ,在实际应用中经常出现矛盾。因此 ,本文对其中的一些不同之处进行了重新的研究考察。并与日本海事检定协会和代表联合国标准测试方法的荷兰应用科学研究组织进行合作 ,对比研究了联合国建议的关于固体氧化物燃烧试验的方法。并就其中发现的问题提出了相应的改进意见。具体有以下 4方面的措施 :(1 )纤维素种类对于燃烧时间的影响 ;(2 )环境湿度及纤维素含水量对燃烧时间的影响 ;(3)导火线材料与导火线破裂方式出现的问题 ;(4)联合国建议中的举例数据。
Due to the difference between the test method of burning solid oxide in Japan Fire Act and the test method suggested in the UN Yellow Book, there are often contradictions in practical application. Therefore, this article makes some re-examination of some of the differences. In collaboration with the Japan Maritime Institute and the Netherlands Applied Science Research Organization, which represents the UN standard test methods, a comparative study of the UN recommended methods for burning solid oxide oxides was conducted. And put forward the corresponding improvement suggestions on the problems found in it. The concrete measures include the following four aspects: (1) the influence of cellulose types on combustion time; (2) the influence of environmental humidity and cellulose moisture content on the combustion time; (3) the problems of fuse materials and fuse breaking; 4) Example data from the UN recommendations.