论文部分内容阅读
目的探究妇产科术前预防性应用抗生素的效果。方法选取2012年2月~2013年2月在我院就诊的200例妇产科手术患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,各100例;对照组术前未进行预防性应用抗生素,观察组术前采取预防性应用抗生素;对两组患者住院时间、抗生素用量以及切口感染情况进行对比。结果观察组患者平均住院时间为(5.9±2.0)d,对照组患者平均住院时间为(9.2±1.6)d,观察组患者住院时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者抗生素用量均值为(5.2±1.6)g,对照组患者抗生素用量均值为(16.8±2.3)g,观察组患者抗生素用量明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者切口感染率(9.00%)明显低于对照组(21.00%),两组数据差异明显(P<0.05),有统计学意义。结论妇产科术前实施预防性应用抗生素具有显著的临床价值作用,值得推广应用。
Objective To investigate the effect of prophylactic antibiotics before obstetrics and gynecology. Methods A total of 200 obstetrics and gynecology patients treated in our hospital from February 2012 to February 2013 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 100 cases in each group. The control group received no prophylactic antibiotics , The observation group before taking prophylactic antibiotics; the two groups of patients in hospital time, the amount of antibiotics and incision infection were compared. Results The average length of hospital stay in the observation group was (5.9 ± 2.0) days. The average length of stay in the control group was (9.2 ± 1.6) days. The length of stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P <0.05). The mean antibiotic dosage in the observation group was (5.2 ± 1.6) g, while that in the control group was (16.8 ± 2.3) g. The antibiotic dosage in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P <0.05). The incision infection rate (9.00%) in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (21.00%), with significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion Preoperative implementation of prophylactic antibiotics has a significant clinical value, and should be widely applied.