论文部分内容阅读
目的引进和翻译Hendrich I Fal risk Model(HFRM)跌倒风险评估量表，并对翻译后的量表信效度进行评价,探索其在中国的适用性。方法将量表进行翻译、回译及文化调试，用中文版HFRM跌倒风险评估量表对北京协和医院住院的老年患者989例进行跌倒风险评估，所得资料运用SPSS 12.0对其进行信效度评价。结果中文版Hendrich跌倒风险评估量表Cronbach'S a系数为0.336，重测信度ICC=0.9950(95%CI 0.9923，0.9984)；评定者间信度ICC=0.9950(95%CI 0.9923，0.9984)；内容效度比CVR为0.9333；因子分析共提取了3个公因子，能解释总方差的50.117%，且各项目在相应因子上有较满意的因子载荷量(>0.4)；当临界值为≥5分时，其敏感度为72%，特异度为69%,ROC曲线下面积为0.815，<0.001。结论中文版Hendrich跌倒风险评估量表具有良好的信度和效度。可作为临床上医务人员用于评估住院老年患者是否有跌倒风险的初步筛查工具。“,”Objective To translate Hendrich I Fal risk Model (HFRM)into Chinese and examine it's reliability and validity in predicting patient fal s. Methods A convenience sample of 989 Chinese elderly inpatients was recruited sequential y upon admission in Peking Union Medical Col ege Hospital. The patients were assessed for fal risk by using the Chinese version of HFRM on admission. SPSS12.0 was used to conduct it's reliability and validity. Results The field test demonstrated excel ent repeatability with an ICC value of 0.9950 (95% CI 0.9923~0.9984).Inter-rater reliability was high with an ICC of 0.9950 (95%CI 0.9923~0.9984). Cronbach's alpha coef icient is 0.366. Content validity is excel ent which CVR is 0.9333. The scale had a sensitivity of 72%and a specificity of 69%when the cut-of point was determined at 5. AUC is 0.815,<0.001. Conclusion The evidence col ected in this study has shown good reliability and validity by using the Chinese version of HFRM in assessing the fal risk of Chinese elderly inpatients.