论文部分内容阅读
在“四清”运动中,中共中央对阶级斗争形势的估计是非常严重的,而且越来越严重,除了“反修”斗争的推动外,也与各地的夸大汇报以及典型夺权经验的推广是分不开的。因此,当时中共中央对阶级斗争形势的严重估计,是上下互相推动的结果。除毛泽东和中共中央外,那些汇报虚假材料、制造所谓“典型经验”的各级领导人,也对此负有不可推卸的责任。这种状况之所以会出现,与我国的高度集中统一的政治体制和干部任命制度是分不开的。要从根本上避免这种状况的发生,就必须进行政治体制和干部任命制度的改革。
In the “Four Qings” movement, the CPC Central Committee’s estimate of the class struggle is very serious and increasingly serious. Apart from the promotion of the “anti-monopoly” struggle, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China also conspired with the exaggerated reports and the typical seizure of power The promotion of experience is inseparable. Therefore, the serious estimation of the class struggle by the CPC Central Committee at that time was the result of mutual promotion from top to bottom. Except for Mao Zedong and the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, leaders at all levels who report false materials and make so-called “typical experiences” also have unshirkable responsibilities. The reason why this situation will emerge is inseparable from the highly centralized political system and system of appointment of cadres in our country. To fundamentally avoid this happening, we must reform the political system and the appointment system of cadres.