论文部分内容阅读
我国现行民事诉讼法(以下简称“现行法”)对裁定救济的相关规定不仅混乱,而且极不完善,常常造成当事人权利保障的缺失。在何种原则的指导下构建裁定救济体系、各种救济措施应如何具体设置、其相互之间是怎样的关系,这是本文写作的意义和讨论的重点。一、民事裁定的救济意义司法公正通常是以承载着司法结果的判决和裁定这两种形式表现出来的。司法不正不仅存在于法治文明发展程度低的社会,就是在法治高度发达的超理想状态下也有其发生的必然性,这主要是由法律技术的漏洞、司法人员专业知识
The relevant provisions of our existing civil procedure law (hereinafter referred to as “current law ”) on the adjudication of relief are not only confusing but also extremely imperfect, often resulting in the lack of protection of the parties’ rights. Under the guidance of which principles, how to set up the system of adjudication relief and how to set various remedial measures and how they are set up are the main points in this paper’s writing and discussion. First, the significance of the remedy of civil ruling Justice is usually based on judgments and rulings that carry the judicial result in both forms. Judicial uncorrection exists not only in a society with a low level of development of the rule of law civilization, but also in the super-ideal state under the rule of law. This is mainly due to the loopholes in law and technology and the professional knowledge of judicial personnel