论文部分内容阅读
亚里士多德将实践智慧界定为依据普遍把握特殊的能力,但是他关于实践和理论分属两个世界的二元论立场,使得以实践智慧为主题的实践哲学无法发挥有效作用。马克思以理论和实践关系的分析实质性地充实了普遍和特殊的关系,不仅避免了亚里士多德出现的割裂实践和理论的弊病,而且通过将理论作为实践的观念组成部分和抽象上升到具体的方法,开辟出一条科学理解理论和实践及其关系的路径,从而凸显出智慧问题的深层意蕴。揭示马克思智慧思想蕴含的丰富内容,对于我们“把马克思主义哲学作为自己的看家本领”有着重要意义,亦可为在理论与实践的互动中发展21世纪中国的马克思主义提供有价值的理论借鉴。
Aristotle defines practical wisdom as a general basis for grasping special abilities, but his dualistic position that practice and theory belong to two worlds makes it impossible for practical philosophy, with the theme of practical wisdom, to play an effective role. Marx’s analysis of the relationship between theory and practice has substantially enriched the relationship between generality and specialization. Aristotle not only avoided Aristotelian practices and theoretical shortcomings, but also increased his theory as an integral part and abstraction of practice The concrete method opens up a path of scientific understanding of theory and practice and its relationship, thus highlighting the deep meaning of the question of wisdom. It is of great significance for us to reveal the rich contents contained in Marx’s intellectual thinking for us to “use Marxist philosophy as our own professional skill.” It can also provide valuable information for developing Marxism in China in the 21st century in the interaction between theory and practice Learn from theory.