论文部分内容阅读
就我们所知,这种全张以前确未见过报道。1993版《区目》提到的“佰伍圆”和“作改”二种加盖错体,在此60枚全张中都没有见到。而据钟笑炉先生在《近代邮刊》4卷6期和水原明窗先生在《中国解放区邮票图鉴》中记述,这二种错体分别位于100枚全张中的第90枚和第91枚。水原《图鉴》对漏“改”字和小“5”字虽有记录,却未注明票位,故此60枚加盖版与100枚加盖版的蜕变关系还不明了。欢迎读者参加对这些问题的进一步讨论。
As far as we know, this full sheet has never been seen before. The 1993 edition of the “district head” mentioned “Bai Wuyuan” and “make changes” two kinds of stamped body, in this 60 Zhang did not see. However, according to Mr. Zhong Xiaofei in the “Modern Journal” 4 Volume 6 and Mr. Suwon Shimogawa in “China Liberation Area stamp pictorial” recorded in the two kinds of errors are located in the 100 full-page 90 and 91 Pieces. Suwon “pictorial” on the leak, “change” and the word “small” 5 Although the record, but did not indicate the votes, so 60 stamps and 100 stamped version of the relationship between the transformation is unclear. Readers are welcome to participate in further discussions on these issues.