论文部分内容阅读
编辑老师:你们好!我是贵刊的忠实读者,非常敬佩贵刊求真、务实的工作作风。在贵刊2001年第三期33页上有篇题为《捕风捉影可以休矣》的文章,该文立意明确、针砭时弊,是篇好文章。但笔者认为,在第4自然段中作者对两则足球方面报道的使用有些欠考虑。客观地讲,这两则新闻在没有明确消息以前确为典型的捕风捉影报道,但随后的事态发展却与报道惊人巧合。对不了解实际情况的读者来说,将其作为捕风捉影新闻的典型,很
Edit teacher: Hello, I am a loyal reader of your magazine, I admire your magazine seeking truth-seeking, pragmatic work style. There is an article on page 33 of the third issue of your journal of 2001 titled “Catching the Wind for a Breakthrough,” which is a good essay that aims to clarify and pinpoint the shortcomings. However, in my opinion, there is some underconsideration about the use of the two football coverage in the fourth paragraph. Objectively speaking, these two news stories were indeed typical windfall reports without clear information, but subsequent developments have been astonishing coincidence with the report. Readers who do not understand the actual situation, as a typical example of catching news, it is