论文部分内容阅读
在对被抓获的曾经组织、策划或具体实施恐怖袭击的犯罪嫌疑人适用武装冲突法还是平时刑法的问题,引起了激烈争辩。美国政府通过扩张解释武装冲突的概念对恐怖分子适用武装冲突法的做法,虽然有利于美国政府使用军事力量实施定点清除,但是这种实用主义政策,却违反了国际法律秩序的基本原则,涉嫌侵犯嫌疑人藏身的国家的领土主权,同时激起无辜平民的不满,容易产生新的恐怖性报复行动,不能从根本上消除恐怖主义。唯有尊重国际法治,始可根除国际恐怖主义。
The issue of applying the law of armed conflict to criminal suspects who had been arrested, planned, or put into practice in the past, or the criminal law in peace, aroused heated debates. Although the U.S. government’s practice of applying the law of armed conflicts to terrorists through the expansion of the concept of armed conflict is conducive to the targeted clearance by the U.S. government using military forces, this pragmatic policy violates the basic principles of the international legal order and is suspected of infringement Suspects hiding the country’s territorial sovereignty, while provoking dissatisfaction with innocent civilians, prone to new terrorist acts of retaliation, can not be fundamentally eliminated terrorism. Only by respecting the rule of international law can international terrorism be eradicated.