论文部分内容阅读
目的比较吻合器吻合与一层内翻缝合法，在食管、贲门癌手术后，吻合口瘘及吻合口狭窄的发生率。方法152例病人使用吻合器，186例病人采用一层内翻缝合法，行食管─胃吻合。结果吻合器吻合的吻合口瘘发生率3．95％，吻合口狭窄发生率9．17％。一层内翻吻合的吻合口瘘发生率为2．15％，吻合口狭窄发生率2．61％。结论二种吻合方式比较，吻合口瘘发生率无显著性差异，吻合口狭窄发生率有显著性差异。
Objective To compare the incidence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stenosis between anastomosis and one-layer varus suture in the treatment of esophageal and cardiac cancer. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen patients used a stapler, and 186 patients underwent an esophageal-gastric anastomosis using a layer of varus suture. Results The incidence of anastomotic fistula anastomosis was 3.95%, and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis was 9.17%. The incidence of anastomotic leakage in a layer of inverted anastomosis was 2.15%, and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis was 2.61%. Conclusion There is no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage among the two anastomosis methods. There is a significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic stenosis.