论文部分内容阅读
科学结构实在论没有处理好形而上学论题。第一,结构实在论作“本质”与“结构”二分,从“本质”的坏之中区分出“结构”的好,错误理解和使用所谓“指称的因果论”。第二,以“结构”的客观性否定反实在论对于客观性的消解,可是“没有关系者的关系”又如何才能说明结构的客观性。没有客观性,结构的实在性又如何保证。第三,ESR与OSR是个体及其内在性讨论的两个进路。内在特性不可知将会导致形而上学与认识论之间出现裂隙。当追问个体内在特性,OSR须以不充分决定性命题否定个体内在性。相反,若承认结构关系与因果关系能够互换,则要承认个体的内在性。第四,OSR把结构作为本体论,却无法回答“空的结构如何起到解释原因的作用?”
The scientific structure realism does not handle the metaphysical topic. First, Structural Realism makes a dichotomy between “Essence ” and “Structure ”, distinguishing “Structure ” from the bad of “Essence ”, misunderstood and used the so-called “ s”. Second, to deny the objectivism of anti-realism from the objectivity of “structure ”, however, “how can the relationship without relationship ” explain the objectivity of structure? Without objectivity, how can the reality of the structure be guaranteed? Third, ESR and OSR are two approaches to the discussion of individuals and their internalities. Intrinsic characteristics of unknown will lead to a gap between metaphysics and epistemology. When asked about the intrinsic characteristics of an individual, the OSR must deny the intrinsic individuality with an inadequately decisive proposition. Conversely, if one recognizes that structural and causal relationships are interchangeable, one must recognize the individual’s internality. Fourth, OSR treats the structure as ontology, but can not answer “how does the empty structure function to explain the cause?” "