论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘疗效及优缺点.方法:选择我院2014年4月到2015年6月收治的80例小儿哮喘患儿作为研究对象,采用盲法随机分为观察组与对照组,每组40例,观察组采用氧驱动雾化吸入法治疗,对照组采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入法治疗,治疗5天后观察观察组与对照组患儿雾化吸入后的效果.结果:在治疗5天之后,观察组显效21例,好换17例,无效2例,总有效率为95.00%;对照组显效15例,好转15例,无效10例,总有效率为75.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入都是小儿哮喘常见的治疗方法,氧驱动雾化吸入方法的总有效率明显高于空气压缩泵雾化吸入法,值得我们在临床上的借鉴与推广.“,”Objective To investigate the efficacy of the treatment of infantile asthma and advantages and disadvantages by oxygen atomization inhalation and air compressor pump atomizing inhalation.Methods Choose from April 2014 to June 2015 treated 80 cases of pediatric asthma, were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases in each group. Observation group by using oxygen atomization inhalation treatment, control group using the method of air compressor pump atomizing inhalation therapy.Results In five days after treatment, observation group 21 cases had marked effect, 17 cases improved, 2 had no effect, the total effective rate was 95.00%. And 15 cases of control group 15 cases were markedly improved, improved 10 cases, the total effective rate was 75.00%. Statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).Conclusions Total effective rate of oxygen atomization inhalation method was obviously higher than that of air compressor pump atomizing inhalation method, is worth popularizing in clinic.