论文部分内容阅读
前人在实践中总结了很多很好的鉴定铜镜的经验,如程长新先生等前辈凭着大量的实践经验从外观特征上看基本面和锈色诸特征总结出一套经验,有一定参考价值。然而其属于眼学,这是需要鉴定者付出大量的实践,长时间的反复总结才能有所收获,速成是不可能的。20世纪以来的考古工作成就,特别是解放后50年中,大量的考古中出土了一些铜镜,为铜镜的鉴定竖立了许多标准样品,而正因为这是科学考古的成果,在断代上有着巨大的作用。但这还是远远不足的,在真伪鉴定上还不充分。现在仿制手段不断提高,造假者常常依《考古》、《文物》发表的资料以及真品仿制。有一些还
The predecessors in practice summed up many good experience in the identification of bronze mirror, such as Mr. Cheng Changxin and other predecessors with a large number of practical experience from the appearance of the characteristics of the fundamentals and rust-colored features summed up a set of experience, there is a certain reference value . However, it belongs to ophthalmology, which requires a large amount of practice by the appraiser. Only after a long period of repeated summarization can it be harvested, and quick success is impossible. Archeology achievements since the 20th century, especially in the 50 years after the liberation, a large number of archeological unearthed some bronze mirrors for the identification of copper erected many standard samples, and precisely because it is the result of scientific archeology, Has a huge role. But this is still far from enough, not enough in the authenticity of identification. Counterfeiting now continues to improve, counterfeiters often according to “archeology”, “artifacts” published information and genuine imitation. There are some still